I know of a few different methods people use to teach factoring, but I’ve never been a fan of the “fancy” methods. They just don’t work for me. When I teach factoring, I actually teach the unit backward. I teach factoring by grouping, factoring trinomials when a≠1, factoring trinomials when a=1, then special cases.

I start with factoring by grouping, because once students can do that, factoring trinomials is easy. I tend to spend an extra day teaching factoring by grouping. When students have that down, I move on to factoring trinomials. I prefer teaching when a≠1 first, because when a=1 is really just a special case. If students can handle the “harder” version, there almost isn’t a need to teach the “easier” version.

So, this is how I teach factoring. This is not revolutionary. It is not new, or even interesting. But it works, every time. I've often heard this method called "splitting the middle".

First, I have students multiply the “a” value by the “c” value.

Then, I tell them they are looking for two numbers that multiply to that value. I have them make a list.

Only after that do I have them find the pair of numbers that adds to the “b” value.

Next, I have students split the middle and finish by factoring by grouping. So, example student work for the example would look like this:

I prefer to teach factoring this way because it doesn’t rely on tricks and it works every time. Also, after this lesson, teaching a=1 is just a special case.

I use the same method when teaching factoring, although I LOVE that you teach the a=1 case after because I always have a student or two who get confused between the two strategies. I think that would help a lot. Thanks!

ReplyDeleteI do this in a similar manner, but when I have them do the factor by grouping I have them put it into an area model. The graphic organizer helps them to see where the common factors are. It works for solving quadratics where a is not 1 as well as cubic expressions that can be factored by grouping. It's also a method I teach to multiply polynomials for those who need their work to be more organized than just distributing.

ReplyDeleteGreat strategy. I enjoy the hands on method of teaching quadratics using Mortenson math blocks. I had some of my own personal "ah, ha" moments playing around with quadratics.

ReplyDeleteI teach special education students and use this same method, in the same order. Your'e right. It works every time. I find I rarely have to teach a=1 because they don't see it as any different. When you multiply a*c, it doesn't matter if a=7 or a=1.

ReplyDeleteI've been doing this for a few years - it also makes it easier when you have to go into factoring four or more terms because they already know how to factor by grouping

ReplyDeleteOver (too many) years of teaching, I have seen and used numerous techniques to factor quadratics (from guess-and-check to box-method) .... this is my favorite and the most easily understood.

ReplyDeleteGenius! Thank you!

ReplyDeleteThats exactly how I teach factoring too. I ask the students to make a list of all factors that multiply to ac using rainbow method and then add them to see which one gets to b!!! Always good to know that there are other good teachers who have same thoughts/ methods as you. I love your resources and your facebook page. Keep them coming

ReplyDeleteI'm a bit confused though. How you would you go about it if it was 4b^2-25?

ReplyDeleteAdd a zero placeholder; it still works (for simplicity/clarity I used "x" instead of "b").

Delete4x^2 + 0x -25

Multiply "a" term times "c" term:

4 * -25 = -100

Factors that multiply to -100, and add up to 0: 10 and -10

So the above becomes:

4x^2 + 10x -10x -25

Group factor the first two terms:

4x^2 + 10x = 2x(2x + 5)

Group factor the second two terms:

-10x - 25 = -5(2x + 5)

Put them together, and you have:

(2x - 5)(2x + 5)

I use the phrase...we are looking for TWO KEY NUMBERS that multiply to "ac" and add to b.

ReplyDeleteBUT my question is, when a=1, do you still have the students break bx into 2 separate terms and using grouping method or do you teach them a shortcut and go right to the factors (x___)(x___) ? In the past, I have not shown my students this little shortcut until a few of them discover it on their own.

I don't teach the shortcut. Many of them figure it out for themselves, and that's fine. However, the students that don't figure it out on their own are typically the students that need a little more practice anyway.

DeleteSo glad to find someone else who skips a=1 at first. It helps students immensely!

ReplyDeleteI'm curious as to *why* we teach factoring quadratics of the form ax^2 + bx + c

ReplyDeleteThe proof grouping works is *NOT ACCESSIBLE* to high school students: http://www.onemathematicalcat.org/algebra_book/online_problems/facByGrpPf.htm

Presumably then, we need factoring by grouping for *what it does*, not *why it works*. Factored representation reveals x-intercepts (and thus, vertex). However, completing the square directly reveals vertex and is how we can derive the quadratic "formula" - which is accessible to grade 11 students

https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2015/10/02/the-quadratic-formula-an-intuitive-explanation/

Can someone comment on why we labor to teach this algorithm? I'm at a loss to know why.

In my opinion, I try to teach several methods to students and allow them to pick the one that makes most sense to them. I do also start with leading coefficient not equal to 1 so that those problems do not seem like the special circumstance. As far as the proof of the grouping method not being accessible to students, I don't try to prove it with students, rather I focus on helping them see that the pattern does exist by looking at several examples. (Like the converse part of the article you referenced but with actual number and not as abstract) I find that this is accessible to students.

DeleteDo you believe that we do not need to teach students how to factor or just that we shouldn't use this algorithm?